South Carolina Lawmakers Hear Testimony on Casino Legislation

legalization of gambling activities within the state.

The bills presented during the meeting included:

• H4176, which introduces the “I-95 Economic and Education Stimulus Act.” This proposal calls for the creation of the South Carolina Gaming Commission, which would have the authority to issue casino licenses in specific counties.
• H3625, the “South Carolina Sports Wagering Act,” seeks to legalize sports betting within the state under certain conditions. The bill would establish the South Carolina Sports Wagering Commission to oversee the industry, set up a tax structure, and regulate betting activities.
• H4129, a bill that redefines certain types of games as skill-based competitions, rather than gambling, provided that the outcome depends on the player’s abilities and not chance.

As the hearing unfolded, a variety of perspectives were shared, reflecting the complex nature of this debate. The bills have the potential to significantly impact South Carolina’s economy, particularly in areas like Orangeburg, where proponents argue that a casino could provide a much-needed boost.

Economic Potential of Casinos in South Carolina

Among the strongest advocates for the bills was Hayes Gainey, a spokesperson for the Santee Development Corporation, which has plans to convert the abandoned Santee Mall into a casino resort. The corporation purchased the property two years ago, and Gainey sees this as a golden opportunity to revitalize the area. The project is expected to bring in an array of economic benefits, including the creation of over 4,600 new jobs and generating an estimated $58 million in annual tax revenue. Gainey stated, “That will bring improvement to quality of lives. That will create a power base in our economy that will create opportunities for many citizens in Orangeburg County and surrounding areas.”

Orangeburg, with its high poverty levels and corresponding crime rates, is seen by proponents as an area that could particularly benefit from such an economic boost. ers believe that a casino could revitalize the community, reduce unemployment, and reduce crime by offering locals stable jobs. “It has been stated that where the poverty level is the highest, the crime rate is the highest, and therefore we can eradicate a whole lot of poverty by allowing this casino to come to Santee,” Gainey added.

Opposition Voices Raise Concerns Over Social Impact

However, not everyone shares this optimism. Opponents of the proposed legislation, particularly within religious communities, expressed deep concerns about the potential harm that legalized gambling could bring. Critics argue that casinos exploit vulnerable individuals, preying on their desperation. One such critic, Steve Pettit, expressed his dismay, saying, “These are systems that feed on desperation. They promise hope, but they deliver harm. They are built to profit from loss and to disguise addiction.” These opponents believe that the promise of economic growth cannot justify the social costs associated with gambling, such as addiction and the erosion of family values.

Government’s Stance and Future of the Debate

Governor Henry McMaster has already made his opposition clear, indicating he would veto any attempts to expand gambling in South Carolina. Despite this, the committee hearing did not result in a vote on the bills. Instead, lawmakers emphasized that the discussion is far from over, and further hearings will be held to address amendments and other concerns raised during the testimony.

The debate over the legalization of casinos in South Carolina is expected to continue, with proponents advocating for economic revitalization and opponents warning about the potential for widespread societal harm. As the state moves forward with this discussion, the future of gambling legislation in South Carolina remains uncertain.

Source:

South Carolina House of Representatives holds hearing on gambling bills, wtoc.com, April 22, 2025.